This looks like an interesting read. Particularly with the traction that resilience currently has in the planning and disaster management community. I had never thought of resilience as a neoliberal concept, in fact many of the examples of resilience that come to my mind are more grass-roots oriented neighbor-to-neighbor or neighborhood/community scale that is consciously outside the state. I also think about lines of flight as examples of the art of living dangerously.
Out soon with Polity Press
What does it mean to live dangerously? This is not just a philosophical question or an ethical call to reflect upon our own individual recklessness. It is a deeply political issue, fundamental to the new doctrine of ‘resilience’ that is becoming a key term of art for governing planetary life in the 21st Century. No longer should we think in terms of evading the possibility of traumatic experiences. Catastrophic events, we are told, are not just inevitable but learning experiences from which we have to grow and prosper, collectively and individually. Vulnerability to threat, injury and loss has to be accepted as a reality of human existence.
In this original and compelling text, Brad Evans and Julian Reid explore the political and philosophical stakes of the resilience turn in security and governmental thinking. Resilience, they argue, is a neo-liberal deceit that works by disempowering endangered…
View original post 57 more words